Federal Reserve

We will have a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT someday and I really don't think it is such a bad idea as along as that one world government's policies and procedures where based on some facsimile to the US Constitution.

Ron Paul, I believe, is a great man and thinker. However, I also think he either starts or concludes too many of his arguments with "its not contained within the constitution". Yes, I know this is sacrilege to many people but I also believe that if our Founding Fathers were alive today our constitution wouldn't look exactly like it does. There is a saying that goes" "when the facts change, I'll change my mind." Well, if we try to compare the world today with the world in the years leading up to the constitution I think you'd see a great many differences.

Having said that, I also don't think there would be radical changes in it either. Nothing like what BHO and many of his predecessors have and are trying to do, which is to discard the entirety of it.

My thoughts arise from the comments by Ron Paul, Chuck Norris and others that the Federal Reserve needs to be audited and I couldn't agree more. But then they go further by stating it has no constitutional basis due to its intrusion upon state's rights. So let me get this right, Ron Paul and the like believe we would be better off with 50 different types of currencies? If anyone can help me understand that reasoning please do so. I seem to remember in early US history of a time when there was unknown numbers of different notes floating around which form one state to another was worthless. And we certainly don't and couldn't go back to a barter system of exchange.

So the natural evolution was to go to a single currency within the US and it follows that as we become more and more entangled with the world economy that we turn to a single currency for the world. The defacto currency now is US Dollar as it should be. Aren't we still greater than 25% of the world's economic output? Probably not for long though.

So I'm not really opposed to a "federal or world reserve" what I am opposed to is the non-transparency and ownership of the organization. It should be open to public scrutiny and never, never, never should be under private ownership.

How we get there is antibody's guess.